Effective Evangelizing
OK, so I've been thinking. Again. You may have heard this example of a number of blindfolded people examining an elephant – one the trunk, one an ear, one a leg, etc., and each coming up with a different answer as to what it is. This is supposed to be an argument for the idea that no one can have an exclusive lock on the truth; that everyone’s idea of truth is equally valid; that many paths lead to God, and therefore all religions are equally valid. First of all, it occurs to me that it’s a self-defeating example. It disproves itself, because it, in itself, requires that the observer, us, see the whole picture – see that there is a truth - see that it is indeed an elephant, and that a number of points of view can actually miss the truth. So this example actually illustrates that there can be an ultimate truth, but that various points of view can be wrong about it. Is Christianity the ultimate truth? Well, we’re not to that point yet. That’s where we invite, saying, “Come and...